Blinded Veterans Association www.bva.org
What's New @ BVA Nav button - home Nav button - National Convention Nav button - Services Nav button - BVA bulletin Nav button - Membership Nav button - Related Links Nav button - Contact Us
 
Home > Legislative Testimony
Image - line
 

C. BLIND REHABILITATION OUTPATIENT SPECIALIST (BROS) PROGRAM

 
 

The other highly specialized outpatient program offered by BRS is the Blind Rehabilitation Outpatient Specialist (BROS) program. This is a relatively new approach to the delivery of blind rehabilitation services to those blinded veterans who cannot or will not attend a residential blind rehabilitation program. A major shortcoming of the VA Blind Rehab in the past was the lack of follow-up for veterans having completed the residential program. VA BRS did not possess the workforce to carry out effective follow-up, which would assess how effectively the veteran had transferred the newly learned skills to his or her home environment. Thanks to Congress earmarking $5,000,000 for BRS in the FY1995 VA Appropriation, BRS was able to establish 14 new BROS positions in 14 different facilities around the system. Following that time, four or more positions have been established. Although this is a comparatively small number of professionals, it provides VA with an excellent opportunity to evaluate the effectiveness of the rehabilitation approach and with what segment of the overall blinded veteran population it is most effective.

The BROS is a highly qualified professional who, ideally, is dually certified: that is, he or she has a dual Masters Degree both in Orientation and Mobility as well as Rehabilitation Teaching. In the absence of such dually credentialed professionals, Masters level blind rehab specialists selected for these positions undergo extensive cross training at one of the BRCs. This prepares these individuals to provide the full range of rehab services in the veteran's home environment. The delivery of such outpatient rehabilitative service may prove to be cost efficient for those veterans who have rehabilitation needs but are unable to attend the residential program. Many of these individuals may be at risk and must not be denied essential rehabilitative services. Additionally, the highly skilled professionals conduct comprehensive assessments of the newly identified blinded veteran's needs to determine if referral to a residential BRC is indicated. If this proves to be the case, they may also provide some initial training before admission, thus potentially reducing the length of stay in the BRC. VA BRS is currently in the process of collecting functional outcome data through the Outcomes Project for this new program. Once sufficient data has been collected, decisions regarding the effectiveness of this method of service delivery can be more appropriately evaluated. Given that there are relatively few active BROS, sufficient data does not currently exist to unequivocally validate this treatment approach. Clearly, given the rapidly aging veteran population and the increased prevalence of blindness associated with aging, there will certainly be an increasing number of severely visually impaired and blinded veterans who will be at risk but unable or unwilling to attend a residential BRC. Field managers, however, seem determined to accomplish all blind rehab services using this model, in effect fully dismantling the residential programs.

Like the full-time VIST Coordinator positions, two Visual Impairment Service Networks (VISNs) have failed to fill vacancies in two of these BROS position. One VISN took more than 14 months to make the decision to fill the vacancy. That was only after BVA elevated the problem to Acting Secretary Gober as previous attempts to have the problem fixed within VHA were unsuccessful. The other network had frozen the vacant BROS position and it remained vacant for more than one year. This comes after the network director, in a letter to BVA, indicated that the position would be filled once approval was sought by the facility. These blatant abuses argue strongly for centralized management authority for all elements of BRS. We appreciate the severe fiscal constraints the networks and facilities are operating under. Nevertheless, just one FTEE makes a bold difference in service delivery for blinded veterans.

Mr. Chairman, the outcome measures gradually being implemented and continually refined by VA BRS will eventually provide a wealth of extremely valuable data about VA Blind Rehab Services. There is hope that this data will not only validate the efficiency of these services but also provide VA with a profile to determine just what method of rehab intervention is most effective with each type of blinded veteran. Here again, VA BRS is engaged in a pioneering effort as this type of data or data collection is unavailable anywhere in the field of blind services. Having a relatively complete profile outlining the rehabilitative needs of blinded veterans and what training model would be most beneficial in addressing those needs would be an extremely valuable tool for VIST Coordinators as they assess the needs of a given blinded veteran. Such a profile should facilitate making the most appropriate referral. Provided the outcome data validates the outpatient delivery model, this could result in substantial cost savings. We caution however, that outcome measures must be fully implemented with sufficient data collection and analysis before programmatic decisions are made.

While we understand the urgency, many network and facility directors feel to complete the transformation of the VA health care system and achieve substantial cost savings, we firmly believe these decisions must be based on solid data. In the case of the special disability programs, those decisions must await sufficient data collection.

Currently VA provides only two options in terms of rehabilitative service delivery, residential blind rehabilitation, and the BROS. The latter is a little more than three years old and is still under development. Furthermore, 16 positions clearly do not provide equity of access to this model of service delivery.

I am pleased to report, however, that VA has initiated a new approach combining the features of a residential program with those of outpatient service delivery. The VAMC Lebanon, Pennsylvania established the Visual Impairment Service Outpatient Rehabilitation (VISOR) program. This approach employs the use of hospital beds for veterans to stay for ten days while attending a regular blind rehab training program. The beds do not enjoy 24-hour nursing coverage and, for all intents-and-purposes is similar to staying in a hotel. The VISOR program is providing functional outcome data to the Outcomes Project, and will afford the opportunity to compare functional outcomes derived from this approach to the more traditional residential BRC or the BROS. There may be other models of service delivery not yet developed and further research in this area must be encouraged. VA should not abandon its leadership role in the field of blind rehabilitation services. They must continue to explore additional alternatives to addressing the needs of blinded veterans. Hasty decisions to move to new untested or unproven models must be strongly resisted.

 

Image - line
Home | Our Mission | About BVA | Services | BVA Bulletin | Membership | Related Links | Support BVA | Contact Us

Image - Line